Manish Sureshkumar vs Yuvan Nandal Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W W L L W L
Form
W W L L W L L L L LHead To Head: Sureshkumar 1 - 0 Nandal
They have played 2 sets in total, with Sureshkumar winning 2 and Nandal winning 0. The last match between Sureshkumar and Nandal was at the M25 Bengaluru, 02-04-2025, First, Hard with Manish Sureshkumar getting the victory 6-2 7-6(2).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Manish Sureshkumar | 1 |
| Yuvan Nandal | 0 |
M25 Bengaluru(02-04-2025)
6
2
7
6
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Halys VS Darderi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Agut VS Clar PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sureshkumar VS Nandal H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Manish Sureshkumar
Player
Yuvan Nandal
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
Sureshkumar VS Nandal H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:45:58 | Average Match Time | 1:45:58 |
| 61% (40/66) | 1st Serve % | 54% (40/74) |
| 73% (29/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (22/40) |
| 38% (10/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (14/34) |
| 36% (5/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 51% (38/74) | Return Points Win % | 41% (27/66) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Manish Sureshkumar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Maxim Zhukov
Player
Manish Sureshkumar
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manish Sureshkumar
Player
Yuvan Nandal
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Siddharth Vishwakarma
Player
Manish Sureshkumar
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
43 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
101
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Woobin Shin
Player
Manish Sureshkumar
55%
(
48 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
11
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manish Sureshkumar
Player
Sidharth Rawat
54%
(
68 of
125)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
49%
(
28 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
42%
(
53 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manish Sureshkumar
Player
Sarthak Suden
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
Player
Manish Sureshkumar
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Manish Sureshkumar
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Manish Sureshkumar
Player
Luca Castelnuovo
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Manish Sureshkumar
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Yuvan Nandal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Manish Sureshkumar
Player
Yuvan Nandal
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nitin Kumar Sinha
Player
Yuvan Nandal
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sidharth Rawat
Player
Yuvan Nandal
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rohan Mehra
Player
Yuvan Nandal
43%
(
39 of
91)
1st Serve %
40%
(
33 of
82)
7
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
8
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
40%
(
21 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 5-7 6-2 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxim Zhukov
Player
Yuvan Nandal
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yuvan Nandal
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
8
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
23 of
28)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
60
|
1-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (199/163) | Win/Loss | 37% (19/33) |
| 53% (441/390) | Sets Win/Loss | 39% (47/72) |
| 52% (3885/3578) | Games Win/Loss | 45% (519/629) |
| 54% (149/127) | Hard Win/Loss | 43% (12/16) |
| 58% (50/36) | Clay Win/Loss | 30% (7/16) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 677 | Aces Total | 158 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 742 | Total Double Faults | 123 |
| 1:25:58 | Average Match Time | 1:27:55 |
| 461.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 439.6 |
| 64% (12990/20182) | 1st Serve % | 55% (1733/3136) |
| 65% (8411/12990) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (1097/1733) |
| 47% (3395/7192) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (632/1403) |
| 46% (1012/2186) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (125/276) |
| 42% (8404/19812) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1165/2983) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 35% (13/24) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 57% (186/138) | Futures W/L | 37% (19/32) |
| 55% (192/352) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 37% (19/51) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (32/65) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (8/14) |
| 58% (62/107) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (7/16) |
| 86% (183/158) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (18/12) |
| 14% (183/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (18/6) |
| 22% (179/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (34/7) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
